Minor documentation updates.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									c1c94fe5a0
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						33a81bffb9
					
				
					 3 changed files with 16 additions and 10 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 | 
			
		|||
  *   - Added a new general RingBuff.h miscellaneous ring buffer library driver header
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Added new GCC_FORCE_POINTER_ACCESS() macro to correct GCC's mishandling of struct pointer accesses
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Added basic driver example use code to the library documentation
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Added new Endpoint_Null_Stream() and Pipe_Null_stream() functions
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Added new Endpoint_Null_Stream() and Pipe_Null_Stream() functions
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Added new ADC_GET_CHANNEL_MASK() convenience macro
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Added new HID report item macros (with HID_RI_ prefix) to allow for easy creation and editing of HID report descriptors
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Added new HID_DESCRIPTOR_MOUSE, HID_DESCRIPTOR_KEYBOARD, HID_DESCRIPTOR_JOYSTICK and HID_DESCRIPTOR_VENDOR macros
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -80,6 +80,9 @@
 | 
			
		|||
  *     error code enum (thanks to Daniel Seibert)
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Fixed ReportID not being removed from the feature/out report data array in the HID class driver when Report IDs are used
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Fixed incorect BUTTONS_BUTTON1 definition for the Minimus board
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Fixed Still Image Host class driver exiting the descriptor search routine prematurely if the data pipes (but not event pipe)
 | 
			
		||||
  *     is found
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Fixed missing call to Pipe_SetInfiniteINRequests() in the Pipe_ConfigurePipe() routine
 | 
			
		||||
  *  - Library Applications:
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Fixed Benito project discarding incoming data from the USB virtual serial port when the USART is busy
 | 
			
		||||
  *   - Fixed broken DFU bootloader, added XPLAIN support for bootloader start when XCK jumpered to ground
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
 | 
			
		|||
 */
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
/**
 | 
			
		||||
 *  \page Page_LUFAvsAtmelStack LUFA vs the Atmel Stack
 | 
			
		||||
 *  \page Page_LUFAvsAtmelStack LUFA vs the Atmel 8-bit USB AVR Stack
 | 
			
		||||
 *
 | 
			
		||||
 *  Atmel offers an official USB AVR stack, which may be incorporated into user projects and products. As LUFA and the Atmel
 | 
			
		||||
 *  stack aims to give roughly the same functionality to a design, it is often asked what advantages LUFA carries over the
 | 
			
		||||
 *  official Atmel USB stack. Below are just some of the advantages to choosing LUFA over the official stack.
 | 
			
		||||
 *  Atmel offers an official 8-bit USB AVR stack, which may be incorporated into user projects and products. As LUFA and the Atmel
 | 
			
		||||
 *  stack aims to give roughly the same functionality to a design, it is often asked what advantages LUFA carries over the official
 | 
			
		||||
 *  Atmel USB stack for the 8-bit USB AVRs. Below are just some of the advantages to choosing LUFA over the official Atmel stack.
 | 
			
		||||
 *
 | 
			
		||||
 *  - <b>Licensing:</b>
 | 
			
		||||
 *    LUFA is released under a very permissive MIT license (see \ref Page_LicenseInfo), while the Atmel stack carries several
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -42,5 +42,11 @@
 | 
			
		|||
 *  - <b>Better Library Support:</b>
 | 
			
		||||
 *    As many people are now using LUFA, there is a community being built around it. You can get answers to your LUFA related questions
 | 
			
		||||
 *    quickly by either emailing the library author (subject to author's schedule) or by posting to the official LUFA support mailing list.
 | 
			
		||||
 *
 | 
			
		||||
 *  - <b>More Compact Code:</b>
 | 
			
		||||
 *    LUFA is written from the ground up to compile optimally, using clean code and good design. Two demos giving the same functionality -
 | 
			
		||||
 *    the LUFA Low Level API Mouse Demo vs. the Atmel AVR270 HID Mouse application note shows LUFA to be the clear size winner *.
 | 
			
		||||
 *
 | 
			
		||||
 *  * <i>LUFA Low Level Mouse Demo: 3510 bytes, Atmel AVR270 Mouse Application Note: 4222 bytes, using an identical build environment.</i>
 | 
			
		||||
 */
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -32,15 +32,12 @@
 | 
			
		|||
 *    seconds each time a new release is made.
 | 
			
		||||
 *
 | 
			
		||||
 *  - <b>Size:</b>
 | 
			
		||||
 *    Not just requiring less code to make complex USB devices, LUFA (under most cases with the correct compile options)
 | 
			
		||||
 *    requires less FLASH space than Atmel's stack, meaning more space for the user application*.
 | 
			
		||||
 *    Not just requiring less code to make complex USB devices, LUFA is written to compile down as much as possible into
 | 
			
		||||
 *    optimal code, to occupy only a small space for its feature set.
 | 
			
		||||
 *
 | 
			
		||||
 *  - <b>Support:</b>
 | 
			
		||||
 *    Since many people are now using LUFA in their own projects, you can take advantage of other's knowledge when you run
 | 
			
		||||
 *    into difficulties or need some advice. In addition, you can also email the library author to receive personalized
 | 
			
		||||
 *    support when you need it (subject to author's schedule).
 | 
			
		||||
 *
 | 
			
		||||
 *   <small>* Atmel Stack Mouse Device Demo 4218 bytes, LUFA Mouse Low Level Device Demo 3526 bytes, under identical build
 | 
			
		||||
 *   environments</small>
 | 
			
		||||
 */
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue